Election board issues first fine for late campaign finance report, say practice will continue. TSC candidate: I'm the ‘scapegoat.’ Plus, conservative Club for Growth comes out swinging against Daniels
“A majority of Americans are ready to embrace conservative policy, ..." No, we're not. The only reason Republicans win any national elections is because they are better at gerrymandering than Democrats, and because the electoral college allows big spaces to count more than large amounts of people.
As against the Republicans who've announced their interest in occupying Mike PanderingIdiot Braun's Senate seat, Mitch Daniels would be the least-worst candidate for the job. But, still, he's terrible: A shallow, milquetoast "conservative" who believes and espouses completely stupid ideas -- like, say, that the federal debt and the federal deficit are grave existential threats to the nation, or that contracts of indentured servitude are a good way to address the problem of student loan debt. He's far less terrible than Todd The Antichrist Rokita, but still awful. If the Democrats, unable to find anyone willing to challenge Daniels, were to run a steaming, fresh cow pat against him, I'd vote for the cow pat. That said, I'd probably campaign for him -- holding my nose -- if the primary contest between him and Rokita looked like it might be close. At the same time, I would enjoy watching Daniels and Rokita flinging poop at each other during the primary campaign.
The only real issue, of course, is whether Cherie will allow him to run. I wouldn't bet on it.
Mitch Daniels is more like Ron Alting than Marjorie Taylor Greene, so true. More like Todd Young than Mike Braun, true as well. As a man married to a man, and a person who believes in women's reproductive rights, I can never vote for an Indiana Republican. BUT, Mitch Daniels is supremely, supremely qualified to be a U.S. Senator. I wouldn't wince if he won.
“A majority of Americans are ready to embrace conservative policy, ..." No, we're not. The only reason Republicans win any national elections is because they are better at gerrymandering than Democrats, and because the electoral college allows big spaces to count more than large amounts of people.
As against the Republicans who've announced their interest in occupying Mike PanderingIdiot Braun's Senate seat, Mitch Daniels would be the least-worst candidate for the job. But, still, he's terrible: A shallow, milquetoast "conservative" who believes and espouses completely stupid ideas -- like, say, that the federal debt and the federal deficit are grave existential threats to the nation, or that contracts of indentured servitude are a good way to address the problem of student loan debt. He's far less terrible than Todd The Antichrist Rokita, but still awful. If the Democrats, unable to find anyone willing to challenge Daniels, were to run a steaming, fresh cow pat against him, I'd vote for the cow pat. That said, I'd probably campaign for him -- holding my nose -- if the primary contest between him and Rokita looked like it might be close. At the same time, I would enjoy watching Daniels and Rokita flinging poop at each other during the primary campaign.
The only real issue, of course, is whether Cherie will allow him to run. I wouldn't bet on it.
Mitch Daniels is more like Ron Alting than Marjorie Taylor Greene, so true. More like Todd Young than Mike Braun, true as well. As a man married to a man, and a person who believes in women's reproductive rights, I can never vote for an Indiana Republican. BUT, Mitch Daniels is supremely, supremely qualified to be a U.S. Senator. I wouldn't wince if he won.