Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mike Dwyer's avatar

I think this is a decent compromise. This will allow SK Hynix to use the Site B preferred site that has more gap between the factory and homes. And then prevent Site A which is next to homes from being industrial. Site B will be an office space buffer similar to building in the Research Park now, Ross Building, Purdue Technology Center, Etc.

Hopefully the CC will approve SiteB rezone.

Expand full comment
Townie's avatar
1dEdited

So, instead of one unrestricted I3 parcel and one <strike>agricultural parcel,</strike> <bold>residential</bold> parcel you'd have one I3 parcel with commitments and one OR zone. That's a net win if you're resigned to the fact that Site A has been zoned I3 for decades and are looking to avoid doubling the industrial footprint. <strike>(I don't think anyone really thinks Site B is likely to remain agricultural indefinitely.)</strike>

If you want the existing I3 to go away entirely somehow, obviously that proposal is no improvement.

(Edit: Added some tags to show how I would edit the original comment if tags did any good.)

Expand full comment
18 more comments...

No posts