In a Friday filing, Copenhaver’s attorneys skip Deery’s claims that voter intent should outweigh clerical errors, instead argue Indiana Supreme Court should let ballot deadlines and her victory stand.
So, will disaffected, and frankly robbed Spencer Deery supporters still vote for Trump-backed Copenhaver? There surely is an alternative--a candidate who has been speaking about the REAL issues facing citizens in Senate District 23. Isn't this a time for bi-partisan rejection of Trump money and Trump lawyers into Senate District 23? isn't this time for fair-minded Hoosier voters to consider voting for the Democratic candidate? West Lafayette City Councilor David Sanders. He comes with no 'strings attached". Can one truly say that about Copenhaver?
With apologies, I don't really care about the Deery/Copenhaver outcome. What I care about are those few voters who have been told their votes don't count because of minor clerical errors. So, it would be fair to void the Recount Commission's decisions if there were any typos or grammar errors in their filings. But again, the outcome will have no impact on Indiana law making as far as I can tell.
Am I following this correctly? Deery submitted his filing to the court well before the Aug 21 commission deadline. Court gave deadlines to both sides, one of which is apparently Aug 24, and court said they would take them under advisement. But, court did not issue a stay on certification, and so Copenhaver's team filed on Aug 21 saying that Aug 21 has now rolled around that's that, and now it's too late for the court to act on the filing Deery submitted before Aug 21?
Unfortunately Sanders carries his own baggage and would not be viewed as a moderate alternative that the more rural counties would consider. With a more centrist candidate I could see this being a possibility.
What are the issues that rural voters really concerned about? Would one Democratic State Senator in a dominated Republican Majority have a real chance to advance so-called "baggage' issues or rather might not a well-reasoned bi-partisan discussion of water rights, gas pump "false recesses", full support of public education, and other shared concerns be a refreshing educating of rural voter--who are not necessarily a locked-in R block? Hoosier voters, rural or urban, do not automatically belong to one party or another. Let's find out in District 23 rather than wishing for a so-called perfect Democratic candidate.
They are worried about social issues. If they were worried about economics, or water rights, or public education they would have supported Democrats a long time ago.
So, will disaffected, and frankly robbed Spencer Deery supporters still vote for Trump-backed Copenhaver? There surely is an alternative--a candidate who has been speaking about the REAL issues facing citizens in Senate District 23. Isn't this a time for bi-partisan rejection of Trump money and Trump lawyers into Senate District 23? isn't this time for fair-minded Hoosier voters to consider voting for the Democratic candidate? West Lafayette City Councilor David Sanders. He comes with no 'strings attached". Can one truly say that about Copenhaver?
With apologies, I don't really care about the Deery/Copenhaver outcome. What I care about are those few voters who have been told their votes don't count because of minor clerical errors. So, it would be fair to void the Recount Commission's decisions if there were any typos or grammar errors in their filings. But again, the outcome will have no impact on Indiana law making as far as I can tell.
Am I following this correctly? Deery submitted his filing to the court well before the Aug 21 commission deadline. Court gave deadlines to both sides, one of which is apparently Aug 24, and court said they would take them under advisement. But, court did not issue a stay on certification, and so Copenhaver's team filed on Aug 21 saying that Aug 21 has now rolled around that's that, and now it's too late for the court to act on the filing Deery submitted before Aug 21?
Unfortunately Sanders carries his own baggage and would not be viewed as a moderate alternative that the more rural counties would consider. With a more centrist candidate I could see this being a possibility.
What are the issues that rural voters really concerned about? Would one Democratic State Senator in a dominated Republican Majority have a real chance to advance so-called "baggage' issues or rather might not a well-reasoned bi-partisan discussion of water rights, gas pump "false recesses", full support of public education, and other shared concerns be a refreshing educating of rural voter--who are not necessarily a locked-in R block? Hoosier voters, rural or urban, do not automatically belong to one party or another. Let's find out in District 23 rather than wishing for a so-called perfect Democratic candidate.
They are worried about social issues. If they were worried about economics, or water rights, or public education they would have supported Democrats a long time ago.
Republicans that voted for Deery won’t most the most part support Paula.