14 Comments
User's avatar
Brian Leung's avatar

Again, watch the movie "There Will Be Blood." Hold for the milkshake scene. There's lots of terrific reporting via the Q&A format here. I appreciate the note about how hydrology conditions differ from place to place. I also think it's crucial, here, to note that we cannot control at what rate the aquifer is replenished, if at all. We can't even predict it. The only thing we can control is how much we remove. If the extraction is related to development, the simple answer is, as learned in California and Arizona, don't make a deal with the water devil. Don't allow water-hungry development in places without enough water. We don't produce water. We cross our fingers and hope it's there when we need it.

Expand full comment
Noemi's avatar

To emphasize Brian's words - " If the extraction is related to development, the simple answer is, as learned in California and Arizona, don't make a deal with the water devil. **Don't allow water-hungry development in places without enough water.** We don't produce water. We cross our fingers and hope it's there when we need it."

Expand full comment
Phthor Quiddity's avatar

Appreciate Prof Frisbee using "lie" and "lying" about lies and lying.

Expand full comment
DL's avatar

Excellent reporting Dave Bangert. Thanks to Prof. Frisbey for explaining how this works to the layperson.

Expand full comment
Harry Smith's avatar

Excellent reporting. We are fortunate to have Purdue expertise AND to have Dave Bangert to get the word out!

Expand full comment
Noemi's avatar

"And the IEDC has made statements that they don't understand why the public doesn't trust them. " Hmmm, wonder why? A lack of transparency? Signing contracts for pipeline designs BEFORE determining taking all that water won't devastate Tippecanoe County and everyone downstream? Not even talking to the people or the local politicians before they went far, far down this path?

Expand full comment
Noemi's avatar

"it would be better if you want to gain the public’s confidence to run some of these tests during the growing season, when water demand is higher." OR, run tests for the next five or ten YEARS to find out what would happen.

Expand full comment
Noemi's avatar

"The first round of tests had INTERA and the IEDC touting wells that could pump upwards of 45 million gallons a day without hurting the aquifer in Tippecanoe County. " There is NOTHING in anything I have read from INTERA that says they even considered "hurting" the aquifers in Tippecanoe County. They have cheerfully reported that there is plenty of water, but have not commented AT ALL on what that kind of pumping would do to the county, its wells, or the aquifer. If I'm wrong, please point me in the right direction. But I have not seen them even ask that question. Not once.

Expand full comment
BillMc's avatar

Thanks for this in-depth reporting. As always, you’re the best source of information on these complex issues.

Expand full comment
Stop the Leap Pipeline's avatar

Thank-you for keeping this issue in the press. I appreciate it. Educating Hoosiers about the LEAP pipeline is most of the battle.

Expand full comment
DarthSlurp's avatar

EXCELLENT reporting, Dave! Thank you for following this CRITICAL environmental disaster in the making!

Expand full comment
Sally A. Mohler's avatar

Outstanding article. Comprehensive, yet in language that the public can understand. Kudos to both Professor Frisbee and yourself.

Expand full comment
Stop the Leap Pipeline's avatar

Excellent analogy. Now all the sports fans understand.

Expand full comment
Dale Berry's avatar

A-plus reporting and story. Thank you, Dave.

Expand full comment