Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zachary Baiel's avatar

🗳️ 🚫 The City Council should vote NO on the question of rezoning the R1 area to I3, keeping the industrial footprint to a minimum in this densely populated residential area.

Since SK hynix will build at Site A regardless (as stated multiple times), there's no need to expand the industrial zoning for unnamed, unknown supply chain partners who have yet to be evaluated and questioned.

That's the compromise in all of this: NO to the rezone.

Sadly, the environmental concerns being raised are answered only in the abstract or high level. I don't understand why SK hynix cannot provide the specific raw data and details from their existing packaging facilities. More in-depth discovery is being deferred to the NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act) and other processes.

And yet, even then, there will be unknowns as it isn't a complete and comprehensive analysis, but one governed by the current rules and regulations. We'll know more, but the picture will still be incomplete.

For example, one defense offered by SK hynix is adherence to the Stockholm Convention regarding 550 types of PFAS. However, are are over 7 million PFAS known (Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in PubChem: 7 Million and Growing, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10634333/).

"In 2021, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) revised the definition of PFAS to include any chemical containing at least one saturated CF2 or CF3 moiety. The consequence is that one of the largest open chemical collections, PubChem, with 116 million compounds, now contains over 7 million PFAS under this revised definition."

Obviously not all of them are used by SK hynix, but I have not read about any evidence that the ones that are have been studied for impacts on health and the environment.

What inputs used and outputs generated are not regulated and/or monitored?

There's more questions than answers at this point. We need more knowledge and data. Having only a little over a year to discuss SK hynix is not enough time for a decision of this gravity.

Expand full comment
Mike Dwyer's avatar

Will there be a video of the presentation this morning?

And will there be a recorded video of the City Council meeting available later?

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts