Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mo's avatar

I hadn’t considered what I read just this morning probably because I’m out of the loop of political circles. Both parties’ insiders supposedly have mentioned that Daniels was behind the last redistricting to be able to include Deery’s home in District 23. That makes sense considering what a lot of people have said about Mr Daniels being behind all sorts of things for years in Indiana. However, even though Deery was the beneficiary of that redistricting, that was done at the designated time to do make changes.

Redistricting being implemented mid term just a few years after it was just done is the main issue. If that had succeeded, we would have been in the third carving out of our part of town. Who knows, we could be carved into a fourth district the next time there was a census.

Our recycling bin is rapidly filling with glossy campaign materials. Each election we get all that mail last minute and we had already voted early. Those millions being spent just on District 23 and District 4 for Baird sure is a waste of a whole lot of money.

It’s a good sign there’s an increase in voting. I know I’m voting very differently in the general election. People just need to get over always voting party only because it’s the candidate that makes the difference. Once some of these candidates get weeded out, I hope voters make good decisions because it won’t be so overwhelming with all these primary candidates trying to figure out who would be the one most likely to work for our best interests.

Phthor Quiddity's avatar

James Waters supported some lousy ideas in a surprisingly recent race he lost badly in Southern California (!). Meanwhile, Julie Roush was busy brushing back election deniers here. If you like me are furtively pulling an R ballot to help Spencer Deery fight against the malignity oozing from MAGA, be sure to remember Ms Roush. She is much less likely to buy an RV, if you get my drift.

No posts

Ready for more?